Instagram, Flickr, or Twitter: Assessing the usability of social media data for visitor monitoring in protected areas
Social media data is increasingly used as a proxy for human activity in different environments, including protected areas, where collecting visitor information is often laborious and expensive, but important for management and marketing. Here, we compared data from Instagram, Twitter and Flickr, and assessed systematically how park popularity and temporal visitor counts derived from social media data perform against high-precision visitor statistics in 56 national parks in Finland and South Africa in 2014. We show that social media activity is highly associated with park popularity, and social mediabased monthly visitation patterns match relatively well with the official visitor counts. However, there were considerable differences between platforms as Instagram clearly outperformed Twitter and Flickr. Furthermore, we show that social media data tend to perform better in more visited parks, and should always be used with caution. Based on stakeholder discussions we identified potential reasons why social media data and visitor statistics might not match: the geography and profile of the park, the visitor profile, and sudden events. Overall the results are encouraging in broader terms: Over 60% of the national parks globally have Twitter or Instagram activity, which could potentially inform global nature conservation.
- Εκδότης: Springer
- Δημιουργός: Tenkanen Henrikki, Di Minin Enrico, Heikinheimo Vuokko, Hausmann Anna, Herbst Marna, Kajala Liisa, and Toivonen, Tuuli
- Πηγή: ResearchGate
- Ιστότοπος: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321691655
- Γλώσσα: Αγγλική
- Άδεια Χρήσης: AΔΕΙΑ CC - Αναφορά στον αρχικό δημιουργό (Attribution)
- Έτος: 2017
- Βιβλιογραφία: Tenkanen Henrikki, Di Minin Enrico, Heikinheimo Vuokko, Hausmann Anna, Herbst Marna, Kajala Liisa, and Toivonen, Tuuli. 2017. Instagram, Flickr, or Twitter: Assessing the usability of social media data for visitor monitoring in protected areas. Scientific Reports. 7. 11 p.
